(1.) SINCE on similar of facts, the common order passed by the Rajasthan Non -Government Educational Institutions Tribunal as also the learned Single Judge are under challenge, both the appeals have been heard together and are been decided by this common order.
(2.) AFTER hearing learned Counsel for the parties, we have very carefully gone through the material on record.
(3.) IT appears only three concerned employees preferred representations before the Vice Chancellor. As per directions of this Court, the representations were decided by the Vice -Chancellor vide order dated 16.12.1996. The Vice -Chancellor was of the opinion that since there has been no regular appointment after due selection in accordance with proper procedure, the concerned -employees were not entitled for the pay scale as claimed by them. The appellant -institution had also been directed to duly advertise the vacancies in question and fill up the same in accordance with law. In case of non -compliance of directions issued by the Vice -Chancellor, the Institution was liable to be de -recognized or even the affiliation could be withdrawn. the order dated 16.12.1996 passed by the Vice -Chancellor was also communicated to the appellant -institution with the directions to submit the compliance report. It was only after passing of order by the Vice -Chancellor as per directions of this Hon'ble Court as referred above, the services of the concerned employees were terminated vide order dated 31.5.1997.