JAI RAJ SINGH Vs. YOGESH SHARMA

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THIS order governs the disposal of application under Section 439(2) of Cr.P.C. by the petitioner Jai Raj Singh seeking cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to the respondent No. 1 Yogesh Sharma vide order dated 22.12.2008 rendered by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, No. 4, Jaipur City, Jaipur which pertains to F.I.R. No. 164/08 of Police Station Jalupura District Jaipur in the offences under Sections 381, 420, 467, 468 and 471 of IPC.

(2.) HEARD the learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the State and perused the relevant provisions of law as also relevant material available on record. Learned counsel for the petitioner has contended that the anticipatory bail granted to the respondent Yogesh Sharma by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, No. 4, Jaipur City, Jaipur and it may adversely affect the progress of the investigation of the case. The comparison of specimen signature is got to be done and the specimen signature cannot be taken by the police unless his bail is cancelled. Learned counsel has further contended that the learned trial court has granted anticipatory bail in a mechanical manner and the material evidence on record has not been taken into consideration. Learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the State has simply submitted that the learned counsel for the petitioner has not assigned any cogent reason seeking cancellation of bail.