VIKRAM SINGH BAINSLA Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

JUDGEMENT

(1.) A request of the petitioner to release him on parole as per provisions of rule 9 of the Rajasthan Prisons (Release on Parole) Rules, 1958, was refused on 12.10.2009 by the District Parole Advisory Committee, hence this petition for writ is preferred.

(2.) IT is submitted by the petitioner that as per the report given by the Superintendent, Central Jail, Bharatpur, the conduct of the petitioner is satisfactory and also that after availing first parole from 5.8.2008 to 24.8.2008 he surrendered himself for undergoing sentence, and as such no misuse of indulgence was made by him. Reply to the writ petition has been filed on behalf of the respondents stating therein that the Superintendent of Police, Bharatpur, by letter dated 5.10.2009 opposed the grant of parole on the count that the same may cause injury to peace and tranquility. IT is also stated that the Deputy Director, Department of Social Justice, opposed the grant of parole.