ROOP KALA Vs. STATE

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD learned Counsel for the parties.

(2.) AS per the stand taken by the respondent in reply, an enquiry was conducted wherein the petitioner admitted that her sister is also working as Aanganwadi worker. However, her contention was that she and her sister both are married and are living with their husbands in separate houses. The said contention was not accepted and, thereafter, it appears that one order was passed on 17.10.2007 by the Director, Woman and Child Development Department, Hanumangarh and in consequence of which, the Child Development Officer, Bhadra District Hanumangarh passed the order on 01.11.2007 terminating the services of the petitioners. Hence this writ petition has been filed by the petitioner to challenge the order dt. 01.11.2007.

(3.) ACCORDING to the petitioner, the copy of the order dt. 17.10.2007, in pursuance of which the order dt. 01.11.2007 has been passed, has not been provided to the petitioner inspite of the petitioner's request for giving copy of the said order.