LAWS(RAJ)-2009-4-27

NEHA SHARMA Vs. RAJ UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES

Decided On April 17, 2009
NEHA SHARMA Appellant
V/S
RAJ. UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) By these writ petitions, a challenge has been made to Ordinance 278-E and 278-G of University of Rajasthan as adopted by Rajasthan University of Health Sciences (hereinafter referred to as "the University") apart from the challenge to sub-clause (v) of Eligibility Clause Category (B) and (C) of the instruction booklet issued by the respondent University pertaining to Pre Post Graduate Medical Examination, 2009. Petitioners have prayed for grant of consequential relief for treating them to be eligible for Pre P.G. Examination of 2009.

(2.) Respondent University issued instruction booklet for the purpose of Pre P.G. Examination of 2009. In para (1), it is provided that out of total seats available in various MD/MS/Diploma courses, 50% of the seats would be filed as per the allocations made by the Director General of Health Services, Government of India, New Delhi. This allocation would be made on the basis of All India Competitive Entrance Examinations for admission to P.G. Courses on open merit system, which is as per the direction of Hon'ble Supreme Court of India. Remaining 50% of total seats available would be filled on the basis of merit pursuant to the Pre P.G. Medical Examination, 2009. The present writ petitioners pertain to 50% of the seats to be filled pursuant to Pre P.G. Entrance Examination, 2009 conducted by the respondent university. In para 2 of the instruction booklet, eligibility for admission is being specified. In sub- para (v), three categories have been provided for General (Non-Service) candidates. The main dispute pertains to category B and category C, which are quoted hereunder for ready reference:

(3.) Since a reference of Ordinance 278-E and G of the Rajasthan University as modified and adopted by the respondent University exists in para (i) of the instruction booklet, hence the Ordinance 278-E is also quoted to the extent, it is relevant to the present case: