KHURAJ Vs. MOTILAL

JUDGEMENT

(1.) In Durga Das v. Devi Das, this court Hon'ble Kan Singh, J. (as he then was) propounded as under:

(2.) Mr. N,K. Rastogi, learned counsel appearing for the defendants-petitioners (for short the defendants) canvassed that the court below has not taken into consideration the provisions contained in the Rajasthan Stamp Law (Adaptation) (Amendment) Act, 1989 (for short the Act). The document in question ought to have been construed as conveyance and it should have been properly stamped. Reliance was placed on Smt. Jamna Bai v. Tulsi Ram, Madan Mohan v. Gauri Shankdr; and Nihal Singh v. Singh Ram & Ors.,

(3.) On the other hand Sh. Dinesh Maheshwari, learned counsel for plaintiff-non- petitioner supported the impugned order and contended that no jurisdictional error was committed by the learned Court below,