URBAN IMPROVEMENT TRUST Vs. UMAID RAM

JUDGEMENT

(1.) This is a revision against the order of learned Additional District Judge No. 3, Jodhpur dated 30.3.96 by which he dismissed Civil Misc. Appeal No. 18/96.

(2.) I have heard the learned counsel for both the parties.

(3.) Brief facts are that plaintiff-respondent filed a civil suit No. 257/91 against U1T. The suit proceeded ex parte because after service of notice nobody appeared on behalf of the UIT. The ex parte decree was passed. Then the counsel for the UIT informed the UIT on 7.3.95 that an exparte decree was passed. Then the UIT submitted an application before the learned Additional Civil Judge alongwith an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act to set aside the exparte decree. The application under Order 9 Rule 12 CPC was dismissed on 8.12.95. Appeal was filed before the learned District Judge which was decided by Additional District Judge on 30.3.96 and the same was dismissed.