NAGRAJ JAIN Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THE petitioner union has prayed that the respondent State Government be restrained from crediting any instalment of Dearness Allowance or arrears of Dearness Allowance of the employees to their General Provident Fund account and prayed that Rule 21 -B of the Rajasthan Service Rules, 1951 (for short, 'the Rules') be declared as unreasonable arbitrary and ultra vires to the provisions of the Constitution.

(2.) SHRI Choudhary, learned Counsel for the petitioner relying upon the judgment of this Court in case of Rajasthan State Ware Housing Corporation v. The Authority Appointed under the Payment of Wages Act. Jaipur reported in 1987 (1) RLR 536, submitted that Rule 21 -B of the Rules is in consistent with the provisions of Section 6 of the Payment of Wages Act, 1936 (for short, the Act'). He submitted that wages should be paid in current coin or currency notes and the State Government cannot deposit the arrears of Dearness Allowance or instalments of Dearness Allowance in the General Provident Fund Account of the Employees. It amounts to deduction from the salary, which is not permissible under Section 6 of the Act, 1936.

(3.) THIS clearly shows that there is a separate provision for the State Employees and there is a purpose behind enacting Rule 21 -B in the Rajasthan Service Rules, which authorises the State Government to credit the instalment of Dearness Allowance or arrears of Dearness Allowance to the G.P.F. Account in accordance with the order issued by the Government from time to time. There is a reasonable classification, therefore, it cannot be said that Rule 21 -B of the Rules is any way arbitrary.