VINOD Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD learned Counsel for the parties. The accused non -petitioners have been released on bail on 11 -11 -1987 and 13 -11 -1987 by this Court. Through this application it has been prayed that the aforesaid order be recalled because the accused non -petitioners are misusing the concession granted to them. In this application it has been stated that the accused non -petitioners are threatening the witnesses in order to refrain them from giving their evidence before the trial court. Learned Counsel for the applicant submits that the report for the aforesaid facts have been lodged by Shri Jhiburam s/o of deceased and one Shri Madan Lal the so -called eye witness. It has not been claimed that after receiving that report the concerning police took any action. In this application it has been alleged that the police did not initiate any action against the accused non -petitioners. In this view of the matter it is alleged that the accused non -petitioners are misusing the liberty of the bail.

(2.) LEARNED Counsel for the non -petitioners on the other hand submits that the accused non -petitioners are not residing in the village where the witnesses reside. He further submits that the allegations are vague and that the bail can be cancelled only when there is a strong case of misusing the liberty given to the non -petitioners by way of granting bail to them.

(3.) IN the light of the observations made above this bail application is dismissed.