VIMAL MALAWAT Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THIS writ petition has been filed for quashing the order (Anx. 3) of the respondent No. 2 (Superintendent of Police, Bhilwara) dated March 2, 1988 by which the petitioner has been discharged from her service with immediate effect.

(2.) THE case of the petitioner is that she was appointed as a lady constable on probation for two years by order dated December 19, 1985 (Anx. 1), It was extended by six months by order dated 24. 11. 87 (Anx. 2 ). Subsequently, she was discharged from the service by order dated March 2, 1988 (Anx. 3 ). She filed representation (Anx. 4) before the Deputy Inspector General of Police, Ajmer and it was rejected by his order dated April 8, 1988 Anx. 5.) Certificates of appreciation (Anxs. 6 to 16) were issued to her. Neither any adverse entry was communicated, nor she was punished in any manner while she was in service. Her services have been terminated because a trainee I. P. S. Officer suspected that letters addressed by him to another lady constable were intercepted by the petitioner and he poisoned the ears of her high-ups.

(3.) ADMITTEDLY, the petitioner was appointed as a lady constable on probation for two years by order (Anx. 1) dated 19. 12. 85, her probation period was extended by order (Anx. 2) dated 24. 11. 87 and she was discharged from the service by order (Anx. 3) dated March 2, 1988. It is also not in dispute that appre-ciation certificates (Anxs. 6 to 16) were issued to her. Her probation period of two years expired in December, 1987. It is clear from these appreciation certificates that they were issued in between April, 1986 to November, 1987. Thus the reply of the respondents (Vide para 6) that they were not issued during the probation period is not correct.