SANJEEV KUMAR PAREEK Vs. SHUBH LAXMI PAREEK

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THIS revision by Sanjeev Kumar husband is directed against an order passed by the Judge, Family Court, Jaipur dated November 16, 1987.

(2.) BRIEF facts of the case are that the petitioner husband filed a petition under Section 12(1)(d) of the Hindu Marriage Act. 1955 (here in after referred to as 'the Act') for granting a decree for nullity of marriage between the parties. The wife Smt. Shubh Laxmi filed an application under Section 24 of the Act for granting interim maintenance and litigation expenses during the pendency of the petition. The Judge Family Court in his order dated November 16, 1987, held that the applicant wife would be entitled to maintenance at rate of Rs. 50/ - p.m. from the date of filing of the application, dated July 4, 1987. The wife has also been allowed expenses of herself and one more person accompanying her of coming to Jaipur and going back to Gangapur City on every date of hearing. The husband aggrieved against the above order has filed the present revision.

(3.) MR . R.K. Pareek learned Counsel for the petitioner, on the other hand, submitted that the impugned order passed under Section 24 of the Act was not interlocutory order and as such every order passed by the Family Court, which was not interlocutory in nature, is appealable under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act.