COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX Vs. DURLABHJI

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THIS application by the Commissioner of Wealth-tax under Section 27(3) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957, is to direct the Tribunal to state the case and refer certain questions of law said to arise out of the Tribunal's order. The Commissioner had applied to the Tribunal for referring these questions of law arising out of the Tribunal's order under Section 27(3) of the Act. These questions relate to the applicability of Rule 2B(2) of the Wealth-tax Rules, 1957, and exemption claimed by the assessee under Section 5(1)(xxxii) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957. The Tribunal has declined to refer any of these questions. Hence, this application under Section 27(3) of the Act.

(2.) THE relevant assessment year is 1979-80. So far as the first question relating to the applicability of Rule 2B(2) of the Wealth-tax Rules is concerned, the same does not arise out of the Tribunal's order. This rule is attracted only when determination of the market value of the closing stock is at an amount exceeding by more than 20% the value disclosed in the balance-sheet. In the present case, the determination of the market value of the closing stock is at an amount less than 20% above the value disclosed. On the basis of this final determination of the market value in appeal, it is obvious that no question of invoking the aid of Rule 2B(2) arose. This question, therefore, does riot arise out of the Tribunal's order. Accordingly, refusal by the Tribunal to refer this question is justified;