JAI NARAIN Vs. PANNA LAL

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THE miscellaneous second appeal has been preferred, by the defendant Jai Narain against the judgment and decree of the learned District Judge, Merta, dated 9/12/1976.

(2.) THE plaintiff -respondent Pannalal filed a suit in the Court of Civil Judge, Nagaur for eviction and arrears of rent regarding the suit shop described in the plaint -inter alia on the ground, of reasonable and bonafide necessity iv, well, as on the ground of subletting and defaults in the payment of rent. The suit of the plaintiff was dismissed by the learned Civil Judge, Nagaur, by his judgment and decree dated 19/9/1973, so far the prayer, of ejectment was concerned; both the grounds i.e. of subletting and bonafide and reasonable necessity were not accepted aggrieved by the judgment and decree of the Civil Judge, Nagaur, the plaintiff preferred an appeal before the District Judge, Merta. While the appeal, was pending before the District Judge, an amendment was made in Section 14 of the Rajasthan Premises (Control of Rent end Eviction) Act, 1950, (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'). After the amendment, Section 14(2) runs as under:

(3.) I have heard the arguments of the learned Counsel for the parties.