HARDAYAL SINGH Vs. CHAGNA

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THIS revision under section 230 of the Rajasthan Tenancy Act has been filed against the order of the Collector, Ajmer dated 13 6 58 whereby it was held that inspite of the repeal of the Ajmer Tenancy and Land Records Act, 1950, the provisions contained in that Act regarding confirmation of proceedings shall continue to be governed by the provisions of the Act.

(2.) WE have heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties and have examined the record as well. Shri Kishanlal Lamror has argued before us that the Rajasthan Tenancy Act repealed the Ajmer Tenancy and Land Records Act. that sec. 206 of the Rajasthan Act is given retrospective effect, that according to this provision the cases that were pending before the confirming courts should be deemed to be converted into appeals and should be transferred to the courts competent to hear them and that the view taken by the learned Collector is therefore untenable. It has been replied by Shri Chitranjan Verma that the Ajmer Tenancy and Land Re* cords Act was not repealed by the Rajasthan Tenancy Act but by the Rajasthan Revenue Laws (Extension) Act. 1957 and hence sec. 206 of the Rajasthan Tenancy Act can have no application to the present case.