RAJENDRA KUMAR MEENA Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that identical controversy has already been raised, considered and adjudicated upon by a Coordinate Bench of this Court in the case of Manju Devi Dorwal & Anr. Versus State of Rajasthan & Ors.: S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.4473/2006, vide order dated 25th February, 2009, after affording an opportunity of hearing to the counsel for the opposite party, observing thus:

(2.) It is further contended that for the present; the petitioner would be satisfied, if the State-respondents are directed to decide the representation of the petitioners in the backdrop of the adjudication made in the case of Manju Devi Dorwal & Anr. , within a time frame, which the petitioner is ready and willing to address within two weeks hereinafter.

(3.) In view of the limited prayer addressed; the instant writ proceedings are closed with a direction to the petitioner to address a comprehensive representation enclosing a copy of the order in the case of Manju Devi Dorwal & Anr. .