STATE OF RAJ. Vs. PRABHU DAYAL

JUDGEMENT

(1.) For the reasons mentioned in the application delay in filing the appeal is condoned.

(2.) None appears for the respondent inspite of service being effected.

(3.) The respondent filed a writ petition claiming entitled to be granted semi-permanent status and thereafter permanent status as a Store Munshi instead of Helper. His claim was premised on the plea that since initial appointment he was working as a Store Munshi and as per Rule 3(3) of the Rajasthan P.W.D. (B&R) including Gardens, Irrigation, Water Works and Ayurvedic Department, Work-charges Employees Service Rules, 1964 he was entitled to be granted semi-permanent status and permanent status on rendering service as contemplated by the Rules for the post of Store Munshi.