SURENDRA SINGH SANKHLA Vs. SMT. SULOCHANA GEHLOT

JUDGEMENT

(1.) These writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India have been preferred, claiming, in sum and substance, the following reliefs:-

(2.) Since the chronology of events and the cause of action in both the writ petitions is common, therefore, they have been heard together and are being decided by this common order.

(3.) Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner-plaintiff filed a suit for specific performance of contract and perpetual injunction against the respondent-defendant on 10.10.2008. The contention in the suit was that on 24.04.2008, an oral agreement was reached between the parties, and accordingly, an agreement to sale was executed on 25.04.2008. The respondent-defendant denied the averments, and also refuted the factum of execution of the agreement to sale.