OM PRAKASH DHADHICH Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

JUDGEMENT

(1.) These writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India have been preferred, in sum and substance, with the following prayers and for the sake of convenience, the prayer clauses are being taken from the leading case being S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.14183/2017.

(2.) Petitioner has preferred this writ petition with the following prayer :-

(3.) The broader consideration is regarding the post of Prabodhak in the Udaipur District. The petitioner was given appointment on the post of Prabodhak. The petitioner underwent the process of selection in accordance with Panchayati Raj Prabodhak Service Rules, 2008 (hereinafter referred to 'Rule 2008') and after undergoing the same, the appointment were given to the petitioner. At this stage, the appointment of the petitioner is being terminated by the respondents vide order dated 27.10.2017 which is under challenged. For brevity, the facts of leading case (S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.14183/2017) are taken into account wherein the petitioner was appointed on 29.09.2008. The petitioner was having the necessary qualification and was eligible for such appointment in accordance with Rules of 2008. The petitioner thereafter underwent the probation period of two year and was thereafter regularized and confirmed on the post of Prabodhak. The relevant portion of the Prabodhak Rules is reads as follows :-