MANOJ KUMAR Vs. SMT. SAPNA

JUDGEMENT

(1.) The present petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C., to assail the order dated 19.2.2018, passed by Family Court, Alwar in Criminal Misc. Case No. 1/191/2016 titled Smt. Sapna and Anr. v. Manoj Kumar, whereby the trial court in an application filed under Section 125 Cr.P.C. by the aggrieved wife awarded interim maintenance at the rate of Rs. 2,000/- per month in favour of respondent wife and also Rs. 2,000/- per month as interim maintenance in favour of minor son of the petitioner.

(2.) Briefly stated, the petitioner Manoj Kumar and respondent Smt. Sapna on 19.11.2012 were married as per Hindu customs and rites at Alwar. At the time of marriage, father of respondent Smt. Sapna had given dowry beyond his capacity. On 25.8.2014, from the loins of petitioner and womb of respondent Sapna, a son was born, who was later named as Aarvi Singh. Due to matrimonial dispute and cruelty caused and because of demand of Car by the accused, respondent Smt. Sapna as per averments made in the petition under Section 125 Cr.P.C. was compelled to leave the house of the petitioner. She returned to her parental house alongwith her son in November, 2014. On 25.7.2016, she filed a petition under Section 125 Cr.P.C. praying for grant of maintenance under Section 125 Cr.P.C. for herself and son. The petitioner filed reply to the application filed under Section 125 Cr.P.C. stating that the respondent wife has obtained qualification of M.A., B.Ed. and is working as Teacher in Lords International School, Alwar and is earning Rs. 10,000/-.

(3.) The trial court vide impugned order, after examining the contentions raised, awarded interim maintenance and held that no evidence has been led that the respondent aggrieved wife is working lady. The trial court also came to conclusion that even non-applicant has failed to prove that the petitioner is working and earning salary Rs.n 15,000/- per month in a Mall. Thus, the trial court concluded as under:-