PREM SANGHI Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

JUDGEMENT

(1.) By way of this appeal, the appellants have challenged the judgment and order of the learned Single Judge, whereby learned Single Judge has dismissed the writ petition.

(2.) The prayer of the petition before the learned Single Judge reads as under:

(3.) In our considered opinion, the so-called order which is now produced on record of the year 1992 was before the learned Single Judge which has been produced before us by way of Order 41, Rule 27. Petitioners, themselves were the party, in the said order of 1992, was shown to the learned Single Judge. The learned Single Judge while deciding the matter has clearly observed that after 1989, the order a Government policy dated 14.08.2015 the question of extension will arise and on 03.11.1989 the order was very clear. Application of 1977 for renewal of lease was rejected in the year 1992. For the convenience, we reproduce the order of the learned Single Judge which reads as under: