POONAM CHAND BHANDARI Vs. VASUNDHRA RAJE SCINDHIYA

JUDGEMENT

(1.) The present criminal contempt petition has been filed alleging that the reply to a correspondent given by one of the respondents undermines the dignity of the court. The following parties have been arrayed as respondents in the contempt petition:-

(2.) It is noteworthy that filing of such petition requires prior approval by the learned Advocate General of the State. The matter came up for the consideration before this Hon'ble Court on 02.04.2018 and the following order was passed:

(3.) On 02.04.2018 the petitioner has filed the order dated 27.03.2018 passed by learned Advocate General of the State by which learned Advocate General has rejected the application of the petitioner which reads as under: