SHIV LAL MEENA Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Heard learned counsel for the appellant as well as learned Public Prosecutor on the application for suspension of sentence.

(2.) With all these arguments, learned counsel has argued that the sentence handed down to appellant-applicant may be suspended. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the application for suspension of sentence. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the sentence awarded, I feel inclined to accept this application for suspension of sentence.

(3.) Accordingly, the application for suspension of sentence filed under Sec. 389 Crimial P.C., 1973 is allowed and it is ordered that the sentences passed by learned Special Judge, NDPS Act Cases No.1, Chittorgarh, vide judgment dated 107.2017, in Sessions Case No.68/2012 against appellant-applicant Shiv Lal Meena S/o Shri Kanhiya Lal, shall remain suspended till final disposal of the aforesaid appeal and he shall be released on bail subject to the condition that he deposits Rs. 1,00,000.00 towards fine within four weeks and furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000.00 with two sureties of Rs. 50,000.00 to the satisfaction of learned trial Judge for his appearance in this Court on 06.02017 and whenever ordered to do so till disposal of the appeal, on the conditions indicated below:-