SURAJ GUPTA Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD learned counsel for the parties.

(2.) I have perused the First Information Report reproduced in the bail application and the rejection order passed by the learned Court below on 18. 1. 2008. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the case of the present petitioner is similar to that of Lal Chand Saini who had already been enlarged on bail. Therefore, the learned counsel submits that the accused Suraj Gupta is entitled for bail.

(3.) AS referred above, the bail applications of the other co- accused person was argued on the primary contention that the owner of the Finance Company are Rakesh Kumar Khatri and Lal Chand Saini, then it appears that at the time of bail application of Lal Chand Saini, the material facts were concealed, so much so, that even the argument made at the time of consideration of the bail application of the AShok Ramawat and Brijesh Kumar was not brought to the notice of that Co-ordinate Bench.