GOVIND KUMAR Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

JUDGEMENT

(1.) M/s. D. S. Marbles Pvt. Ltd. , a Company registered under the Companies act, 1956, having its registered office at national Highway No. 8 Pawamagri, Sukher, district Udaipur, submitted this application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short 'the Act of 1996')for appointment of an Arbitrator.

(2.) NOTICES were issued to respondents but no reply has been filed by them.

(3.) AS per the facts mentioned in the application, the applicant entered into an agency contract with the respondents through contract dated 8-9-2000 for supply of superlite marble as per the rates mentioned in para 4 of the contract agreement which was for a period of five years, As per the terms of the contract, the applicant submitted a sum of Rs. 5,00,000/- by way of demand Draft Dated 15-9-2005 as security amount and according to the applicant, that amount was refundable to the applicant after expiry of the period of the contract. Pursuant to the said agreement, the respondents supplied the marble blocks on two occasions, i. e. No. B-1 and B-2, dated 30-8-2000 in the amount of Rs. 13,996/- and rs. 13449/- respectively and thereafter, the respondents did not make any supply of marble. According to the applicant, the respondents failed to carry out their contractual obligation according to the terms and conditions of the contract because of which the applicant suffered huge loss as the applicant had made commitments to the prospective buyers and that could not be fulfilled and the applicant had to get marble from other sources at a higher rates. The applicant further submitted that the non-applicant respondents have not refunded the deposit amount which was deposited by the applicant with the respondents by way of security deposit.