SULOCHNA Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THE appellant has preferred this special appeal aggrieved by the judgment of the learned Single Judge dated 27. 5. 08. THE learned Single Judge in the aforesaid judgment has dismissed her writ petition wherein she challenged the order dated 26. 7. 2001 cancelling her appointment order dated 31. 8. 1998 and also the consequential order dated 31. 7. 2001, which is to the same effect.

(2.) THE appellant passed senior secondary examination in 1990 and thereafter joined the diploma course in Nursing in 1991. She completed her diploma course in 1994 as is evident from the mark sheet dated 27. 6. 1994 which is on record. THE appellant upon completion of two and a half years diploma course of Nursing applied for appointment on the post of Ayurved Junior Compounder/nurse. She was appointed vide order dated 31. 8. 1998. One Smt. Vimla Purohit filed a writ petition before the Principal Seat of this Court being S. B. Civil Writ Petition No. 704/2000 claiming that since she, like the petitioner, had also completed the intership course of Nursing on 15. 2. 1995, she should also be appointed. THE respondents contended before the Court that since the intership of the appellant herein was completed on 15. 2. 1995 whereas she wrongly stated the same to have been completed on 27. 6. 1994, her Nursing diploma course would therefore be taken to have been completed in 1995 and not in 1994 thus rendering her ineligible for appointment in the selection in question. It was thereafter that the appellant was served with a notice to show cause on 2. 1. 2001 as to why her appointment may not be cancelled, to which she submitted reply on 11. 6. 01 and ultimately the respondents by order dated 26. 7. 01 cancelled the appointment of the appellant and the writ petition of Vimla Purohit was dismissed.

(3.) WE have given our anxious consideration to the rival submissions and perused the impugned judgment and other material forming part of record.