SHANKAR LAL Vs. ADDL DISTT JUDGE SUJANGARH

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD learned counsel for the petitioners and perused the material placed on record.

(2.) THE petitioners-defendants Nos. 1 and 2 are defending a suit for recovery of possession of immovable property and mesne profits as filed by the plaintiff-respondent No. 2.

(3.) THE hyper-technical submissions as sought to be made on behalf of the petitioners remain not only bereft of substance but are clearly indicative of their intention to somehow put the rules of procedure to a negative use, and to elongate the proceedings; and so also of suggesting the propositions as if the learned trial Court dealing with the civil suit has no jurisdiction to pass an order of the present nature of taking documents on record if they have been filed late and merely because the plaintiff earlier did not seek permission to produce the same. This Court is clearly of opinion that not only this baseless petition deserves to be rejected but further, the costs as imposed by the trial Court on the plaintiff deserve not to be allowed to the defendants for their conduct of taking up frivolous litigation like the present writ petition.