VIJAY VERMA Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THE petitioners have filed this misc. petition under Section 482 Cr. P. C. with the prayer that the F. I. R. No. 150/2006 registered at Kotwali, Jhunjhunu under Sections 498a, 406 IPC be quashed.

(2.) LEARNED counsel for the petitioners have contended that even if the allegations contained in the F. I. R. are accepted in toto still Kotwali, Jhunjhunu has no jurisdiction to entertain the report because no part of cause of action has arisen within the jurisdiction of Kotwali, Jhunjhunu as the respondent No. 2 herself has disclosed in the F. I. R. lodged on 14. 5. 2006 that she returned to her parental home on 25. 6. 2005 and that all the acts which are per se without basis were committed at Bikaner. He, therefore, prays that the F. I. R. against the petitioners be quashed. He places reliance on (2004) 8 SCC 100.

(3.) THE criminal misc. petition stands dismissed. .