USHA SAXENA Vs. OFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD learned Counsel for the parties. It appears that while disposing of the Application No. 95/2005 on 25 -5 -2007 this fact was not brought to the notice of the Court that Usha Saxena had expired. On that day this Court directed the applicant to furnish undertaking. The said undertaking could not be furnished since Usha Saxena was dead.

(2.) THEREFORE another application was filed by the legal Representatives of Usha Saxena seeking direction in the name of Official Liquidator to comply with the order dated 25 -5 -2007.

(3.) I however direct that the security deposited with the applicant shall not be claimed by the Official Liquidator.