HARI RAM Vs. MAHARANA PRATAP AGRICULTURE TECHNOLOGY UNIVERSITY

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THIS writ petition is the second innings of the petitioner for seeking relief against the respondents for allowing retiral benefits on the basis of selection scales already granted to him by the respondent University and for quashing Annex. 12 dated 18. 11. 2005 and Annex. 13 dated 9/13. 12. 2005.

(2.) BRIEF facts of the case are that the petitioner was appointed initially as Helper to Mechanic with effect from 3. 5. 1966 in the grade of Rs. 45-70. He was confirmed on the post of Helper to Mechanic with effect from 3. 5. 1967 vide order dated 6. 6. 1968.

(3.) THE petitioner being aggrieved and dissatisfied with the illegal action of the respondent for recovery and the benefits earlier granted to him having been taken back approached this Court by way of filing S. B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1883/2005, decided on 24. 8. 2005. In the said writ petition, decided by a co- ordinate Bench, the following order was passed on 24. 8. 2005: &nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp&nbsp" Thus, this writ petition filed by the petitioners is allowed and the order dtd. 22. 3. 2005 along with PPO dtd. 24. 3. 2005 (Annex. 6) and revision of pay of the petitioner vide statement (Annex. 9a) are quashed and set aside. However, the petitioner is directed to file a fresh representation within a period of 15 days from today, and the concerned authority is directed to consider and decided the same either way in accordance with law within one month from the date of receipt of the said representation. If it is found that the petitioner is entitled for any relief in accordance with law, then the same may be given to the petitioner and if the petitioner is not found entitled to the relief sought for, then a reasoned and speaking order, strictly in accordance with law, may be passed, after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. "