HARMINDER KAUR Vs. YOGENDRA TANEJA

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD learned Counsel for the parties.

(2.) THE petitioner, wife of the respondent, has filed this petition for transfer of the petition filed by the respondent under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act before the District Judge, Rajsamand to the Court at Suratgarh.

(3.) LEARNED Counsel for the respondent submitted that the respondent was attacked by the petitioner's family and a criminal case has already been launched by the respondent against the petitioner's family members in which cognizance has been taken by Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Suratgarh by order dt. 26.09.2007, copy of which has been placed on record. It is also submitted that the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Anindita Das v. Srijit Das reported in (2006) 9 SCC 197 also refused to transfer the case and this Court in the case of Teena v. Vinod Kumar S.B. Civil Misc. Transfer Petition No. 5/2007 refused to transfer the case at the place where the lady was residing.