INDRAJEET SINGH MEENA Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

JUDGEMENT

(1.) IN this bunch of writ petitions, the petitioners are challenging the order dated 27. 7. 2007 (Annex. 3) and further prayed for a direction to the respondents to declare their results in accordance with the papers performed by them in Secondary School Examination.

(2.) IN all these writ petitions similar point is involved, therefore, for convenience, they are being disposed of by this common order and facts of S. B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5166/2007 (INderjeet Singh Meena vs. State of Raj. & Ors.) are taken into consideration.

(3.) IT is also pointed out by the petitioner that in all 56 students were taken to the task by way of issuing similar notice, but after completion of inquiry, result of 29 students was declared and they were exonerated by the Committee, but petitioner along with 26 other students were penalized by cancelling their examination of Secondary School for the year 2006-2007. Learned counsel for the petitioner while attacking upon the order impugned contended that similar kind of notices were issued to the students, whose results had been declared but case of the petitioner was not considered at par with those students, who were similarly situated namely; Shri Vishnu Kumar Vaishnav, Sangeeta Meena and Piyush Kumar Maheshwari. Upon these students also same allegations were levelled but no punishment was inflicted and their results were declared. IT is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that respondents have not shown any reason or ground to justify their action. IT is vehemently argued by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the Board has passed the order of cancellation in a mechanical manner which is evident from the fact that the order is in printed/typed form and similar type of orders have been issued in case of other students also. The Board has not even mentioned that what evidence is on record for levelling such allegation of using unfair means.