SAKOO (SMT.) Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS.

JUDGEMENT

(1.) BY this writ petition the petitioner has challenged the selection of respondent No. 6 on the post of 'Anganbari Karyakarta ' by Gram Panchayat, Khardia of Panchayat Samiti, Sindhari.

(2.) THE challenge has been made mainly on the ground that as per Annexure/7 dt. 15.09.2003 issued by the Women and Child Development Department, the selection was required to be made as per para No. 6 of the circular where it is provided that if a candidate is having qualification then the preference is required to be given.

(3.) LEARNED Counsel appearing for the respondent No. 4 and 5 submits that necessary consideration was made by the Gram Panchayat pursuant to the order Annexure/4 dt. 12.02.2007 in as much as Child Development Project Officer issued direction for such consideration at the earliest. It has further been submitted that the petitioner has not applied for the post of 'Anganbari Karyakarta, hence question of consideration of her candidature does not arise therefore, respondent No. 6 was appointed pursuant to the only application received by the Gram Panchayat. Thus, learned Counsel for the respondent No. 4 to 5 supported the action of Gram Panchayat, though admitted that Gram Panchayat failed to give publicity for calling for application and competence as per circular dt. 15.09.2003.