RAM LAL Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. This criminal miscellaneous petition has been filed by the accused-petitioner against the order of framing charge by the trial Court on 30.11.2004 as well as the order dated 16,6.2007 passed by the learned revisional Court. 2. By the order impugned, the learned Magistrate had framed charges against the accused-petitioner for the offence, inter alia, Sections 392/149 and 347/149 I.P.C. Thereafter, the learned revisional Court had also rejected the revision petition preferred by the accused-petitioner. The learned trial Court, on 3.3.2005 had summoned the witnesses in the case. 3. After having carefully considered the orders passed by both the Courts below, I am of the considered opinion that no illegality or infirmity has been committed in the said orders so as to call for any interference by this Court in exercise of inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. Moreover, there is no just reason for interfering in the finding recorded by the Courts below. This view of mine is supported by the Apex Court in the case of Ramkaran v. Gyarsi and Anr., (2005) 12 SCC 341, wherein the Hon'ble Supreme Court has held as under:

(2.) Consequently, this criminal miscellaneous petition is dismissed, as being devoid of merits.