BHANWARLAL Vs. RAJENDRA PRASAD

JUDGEMENT

(1.) EACH of these eight revision petitions involving similar nature issue is barred by limitation by a few days (31 -34 days); and each of the petitioners has moved application for condonation of delay stating a similar nature ground that for want of proper legal advice and for his being a layman, could not immediately take requisite steps for assailing the order in question.

(2.) HAVING regard to the circumstances, ignoring the delay, the matters have been considered on merits.

(3.) THE contention as sought to be urged on behalf of the defendantspetitioners remains fundamentally baseless for the fact that no such notification has been shown whereby operation of the provisions of the Act of 2001 stands extended to the area in question. Section 1 of the Act of 2001 before its amendment read as under: