REGENT COMPUTRONICS PVT. LTD.

D R Kalla Appellant

V/S

STATE OF RAJASTHAN Respondents

Referred Judgements :-

INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE AND ANR. V. THAVASIAPPAN [REFERRED TO]
PARISHAD V. SANJEEV RAJAN [REFERRED TO]
MINISTRY OF DEFENCE V. S. DENIAL ETC. [REFERRED TO]
DELHI CLOTH AND GENERAL MILLS COMPANY LIMITED VS. KUSHAL BHAN [REFERRED TO]
R P KAPUR VS. UNION OF INDIA [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH VS. SHARDUL SINGH [REFERRED TO]
KUSHESHWAR DUBEY VS. BHARAT COKING COAL LIMITED [REFERRED TO]
P V SRINIVASA SASTRY VS. COMPTROLLER AND AUDITOR GENERAL [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF ORISSA VS. BIMAL KUMAR MOHANTY [REFERRED TO]
SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT PROHIBITION AND EXCISE DEPARTMENT VS. L SRINIVASAN [REFERRED TO]
DIRECTOR GENERAL ESI VS. T ABDUL RAZAK [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF RAJASTHAN VS. B K MEENA [REFERRED TO]

JUDGEMENT

(1.) IN all these cases, similar legal issues are involved and therefore, they are being disposed of by a common judgment.

(2.) MAINLY two averments have been made. Firstly ; the authority which passed the impugned suspension order is not competent to do so, not being the appointing authority and, secondly; petitioners are facing criminal trial, on the same charges and the disciplinary proceedings ought to have been stayed till the finalisation of the trial in the criminal court.

(3.) THE issues involved are no more res Integra. The said issues had been considered in a catena of decisions. On the first issue, learned Counsel for the petitioners have vehemently argued that the authorities which passed the suspension orders are not the appointing authorities of the petitioners and, thus, the impugned suspension orders are bad for want of competence.

Click here to view full judgment.

D R KALLA Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

Referred Judgements :-

JUDGEMENT

QUick Links

Get in Touch

Email

Contact Numbers

Address