SATISH KUMAR SOOD Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THE writ petitioner Satish Kumar Sood has filed the writ application praying for an appropriate writ, direction or order against the respondents to expunge the adverse entries in the Annual Confidential Reports as recorded in Annexures 6 and 7 to the Writ application and also made ancillary prayers against the respondent No. 2 against whom there were allegations of perso- nal bias and enmity.

(2.) THE remarks as contained in Annexure-6 to the writ application were pertaining to the years 1984-85 and the same were communicated to the writ petitioner on 2. 6. 1989 by the Director, Directorate of Information and Public Relations, Jaipur, which inter- alia read as follows : 1- dezpkjh viuh M~;wvh ds izfr mnklhu ,oa fuf";a 2- dk;z dh vko';drkvksa ds vuq#i larks"kizn Kku dk vhkko] vf/kd lh[kus dh vfhkyk"kk u j[kus okyka 3- dnkfpr gh y{;ksa dh iwfrz djus okyk] dk;z leiknu ds ckjs esa vur% izsj. kk dk vhkko ftlls fu"ikfnr dk;z vi;kzir jg tkrk gsa

(3.) THE main grounds of attack of the writ petitioner in respect of these adverse entries were that these were an outcome of the malice that the respondent No. 2 did bear towards the writ petitioner. Had the allegations been true, the self- same Officer would not have given good character certificates as in Annexures 4 and 5 which spoke of a high rate of character and integrity as testified to by him.