TEJ SINGH Vs. S T A T

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD the learned Counsel for the parties.

(2.) PETITIONER Tej Singh has filed this petition in his capacity as president of Bidasar -Degana Yatri Parivahan Association under Article 226 of the Constitution and prayed that the impugned orders passed by the R.T.A., Ajmer dated 12.2.92 (Annex. 16) and the order dated 18.6.92 (Annex. 17) passed by the S.T.A. Tribunal, Jaipur be quashed and set aside.

(3.) A preliminary objection was raised regarding the maintainability of this writ petition at the instance of Shri Tej Singh in his capacity as a President of the Association by learned Counsel Shri Dave for the respondent. There is lot of substance in the preliminary objection raised by Shri Dave. The appeal filed by petitioner Tej Singh before S.T.A.T. was also not maintainable. When the Tribunal held that the appeal filed by Tej Singh in his capacity as a President of the Association was not maintainable. The learned Tribunal rightly held that all the persons should have filed separate appeals against the order passed by R.T.A. Therefore, on this ground also, this revision deserves to be dismissed.