(1.) THE plaintiff petitioners filed a suit for eviction against the non-petitioners on 2. 11. 1982, and according to him the rent from. 1. 1. 1981 to 31. 12. 1982 had not been paid. THE rate of rent was Rs. 11/-p. m. On 15 3 1984, the trial court viz. M. J. M. Chirawa, passed an order, which may be paid to be an order under Sec. 13 (3) of the Rajasthan Premises (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, (hereinafter referred to as the Act ). By this order, he has made the following directions, (1 ). Rent at the rate of Rs. 11/- p. m. till the date of filing of the suit be deposited within 15 days. (2 ). THE rent after this period and uptil 1. 3. 1984, be deposited within one month. (3 ). THEreafter rent be deposited by the first of every month.
(2.) IT was also ordered that if any rent had been deposited then it was not necessary to deposit again. On the objection of the counsel for the defendant, this order was immediately modified and the rent of future-months was allowed to be deposited by the 15th of the next month.
(3.) IT has been argued that when a certain period has expired then there can not be an extension of the same and the application for extension of time should have been moved before the time fixed for deposit of rent, expired.