(1.) THIS revision petition is directed against the order of the first appellate court District Judge, Jaipur dated 4,5. 1985 passed in Appeal No. 7 of 1982 whereby the amendment application dated 24. 9. 1982 was rejected.
(2.) THE case has got a chequered history and that according to Mr. Vidhya Bhushan, it is now going to be three decades of this litigation.
(3.) VFOOKFGR L=h** lateron an effort was made to introduce that there was a legitimate marriage according to the religious ceremony of Hindus between Ganpati Devi and Gori Lal. It is not necessary to mention the entire history of this amendment application which was earlier allowed and there was a revision and there was an acceptance of the revision and further remand of the case, because this all is irrelevant for the purpose of decision of this revision petition.