LAWS(RAJ)-1987-2-32

COMMERCIAL TAXES OFFICER Vs. MANGI RAM HARI RAM

Decided On February 03, 1987
COMMERCIAL TAXES OFFICER Appellant
V/S
MANGI RAM HARI RAM Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THIS was a reference which is now heard as a revision under section 15 of the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1954, as amended by the Amendment Act of 1984. The question of law referred for the decision of this Court, is the following : " Whether, on the facts and circumstances of the case, the Board of Revenue was justified in holding that the containers were not taxable without considering whether there was implied sale or not ?"

(2.) THE assessee was a dealer carrying on business of manufacture and sale of snuff. For the year 1968-69, the assessing authority found that the assessee sold snuff packed in tin containers as inter-State sales, to the extent of Rs. 3,38,871. 56 out of which, the value of the tin containers amounted to Rs. 48,264. 93 as revealed from the account books. In the sale transaction of snuff, no separate charge was recovered for the tin containers, and the goods sold, namely, snuff, was exempt from sales tax. THE assessing authority held that the transaction included implied sale of the packing material, and was therefore, exigible to sales tax, even though, the goods sold, namely, snuff, was exempt from tax. THE assessee's appeal to the Deputy Commissioner (Appeals) was allowed taking the view that there was no express or implied sale of the containers in which, the snuff sold had been packed. THE department being aggrieved by this decision, went to the Board of Revenue, which held that the goods sold, namely, snuff, being exempt from tax, its packing material, i. e. , tin containers, for which, no separate charge was levied, were also exempt from tax in accordance with the last proviso to sub-section (1) of section 5 of the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1954. THE revision of the department was accordingly dismissed. This has given rise to a reference of the above question of law, for its decision by this Court in accordance with the earlier existing provision in the Act, and according to the newly substituted section 15 of the Act, it has now been heard as a revision.