KAILASH CHAND BANSAL Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

JUDGEMENT

(1.) NOTICE of this petition has been given to the State; and with the consent of both the learned Counsel, it is being finally disposed of at admission -stage.

(2.) KAILASH Chand has preferred this miscellaneous petition under Section 482, Cr.P.C. against the order of ADJ No. 2, Bharatpur (camp at Bayana) dated 22nd Jan.,1987, by which, he maintained the order of the MJM, Weir, with some modification.

(3.) MR . Dhankhar, the learned for the petitioner argued that there is no dispute that the goods seized belong to the petitioner. According to him, there is no restriction in the transportation of 'Daal from one place to another and that, if any offence has been committed by the driver or the owner of the truck or by the Transport Company, that offence is not in relation to the transportation of goods but in some other matter, which has no connection with the present case. Therefore, Mr. Dhankhar argued that imposing the condition of furnishing bank -guarantee upon the petitioner would be hardship, who has to deposit the amount of Rs. 75,000/ - in the bank for taking delivery of the seized goods.