SHEONATH Vs. HAZARI

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THIS revision has been filed under sec. 187 of the Ajmer Tenancy and Land Records Act, 1950, and is directed against an order of the Collector, Ajmer dated 10.10.56 in a case relating to the appointment of two headmen in village Rampura.

(2.) WE have heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties and have also examined the record. The facts of the case lie within a short compass and may be briefly stated as follows:- Rampura village is situated in the former Istimrari estate of Pisangan in Tahsil and District Ajmer. Subsequent to the abolition of Intermediaries in the erstwhile State of Ajmer, the Collector of Ajmer decided that two Lamberdars should be appointed in that village and nominations were invited for the purpose. After following the usual procedure which obtains in such cases the Sub-Divisional Officer, Ajmer recommended the name of Sarv Shri Hazari and Misrilal for the two posts. He rejected the claim of the third candidate Shri Sheonath. After going through the matter and weighing the claims of the candidates the learned Collector came to the conclusion that the learned Sub-Divisional Officer had not dealt with the claims of Sarv Shri Hazari and Sheonath in a proper manner. He therefore remanded the case to him with the direction that he shall hold a further enquiry in the matter and submit a detailed report. Aggrieved by the decision of the learned Collector, Shri Sheonath has come in revision to the Board.