SURESH KUMAR Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD learned counsel for the parties.

(2.) THE appellant filed a writ petition before the learned Single Judge with the prayer that the action of the respondents depriving the appellant from giving the appointment on the post of sub-Inspector (Police) be held illegal and unreasonable and direction was sought in the name of the respondents to appoint the appellant on the post of Sub-Inspector Police with all consequential benefits. Learned Single Judge, however did not agree with the appellant and vide order dated April 10, 2002 dismissed the writ petition. Against this order of the learned Single Judge that the present action for filing the instant special appeal has been resorted to by the appellant.

(3.) HAVING scanned the material on record, we notice that the learned Single Judge after hearing the rival submissions posted the case for dictation of orders. It also appears that during the pendency of the writ petition before the learned Single Judge, respondents placed on record the letter dated January 29, 2002 of DGP addressed to the Additional Superintendent of Police, C. I. D. (Dowry Cell), Rajasthan, Jaipur, wherein it was stated that the appellant was not given appointment since he was not found fit for appointment to the post of Sub-Inspector of Police. In view of said letter learned Single Judge, while observing that fresh cause of action arose to the appellant, dismissed the writ petition.