SHAHI Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Public Prosecutor for State and learned counsel for the complainant and also perused the material on record.

(2.) THIS application for cancellation of bail is against the order dated 31. 10. 2006 passed by A. D. J. No. 2, Bayana, District Bharatpur whereby the accused Harishanker was granted bail. There is no dispute with regard to the fact that the accused-respondent had not misused the liberty of bail because such is not at all the case of the petitioner. The case of the petitioner is that the learned Court below has erroneously granted bail and not considered the facts and circumstances and the gravity of the offence.

(3.) A perusal of the order impugned dated 31st of October, 2006 goes to show that the learned Court below has passed a detailed order giving all material facts and has given the reasoning after taking into consideration the evidence record, as for instance the medical evidence, the statement of Smt. Draupdi, mother of prosecutrix, Kanwar Singh, Mukesh, Buddha Ram, P. N. Mishra, Smt. Munesh and Smt. Munni.