LAWS(RAJ)-2007-4-3

ALKA DADHICH Vs. AJAY DADHICH

Decided On April 30, 2007
ALKA DADHICH Appellant
V/S
AJAY DADHICH Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THE appellant wife in this appeal impugns the decree for divorce dated May 12, 2006 of learned Family Court Ajmer whereby the petition of respondent husband filed under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (for short `the Act') was allowed, marital ties were snapped and it was indicated that the appellant wife was guilty of cruelty.

(2.) AS per the averments made in the petition the marriage between the appellant wife (or short `wife') and respondent husband (for short `husband') took place on December 2, 1999. After honeymoon at Mount Abu till December 23, 1999 the wife went with husband to Sagar (MP) where the husband was deployed as Lieutenant and wife stayed there till February, 2000. Thereafter the wife became pregnant and left Sagar for Bhilwara with her brother and mother against the will of husband. In April, 2000 the husband came on leave and took the wife to Ajmer where both resided together till May 6, 2000. After the husband left Ajmer for joining his duty leaving the wife with the parents of husband, the wife started behaving in a strange manner. She never used to cover her head with sari, started sitting in Varandah only in Peticoat-blouse and used to talk in filthy lanaguage. On May 30, 2000 the wife beat mother of husband and threatened the parents of husband to implicate them in a false case. She compelled her father in law to leave her to Bhilwara with two FDRs of Rs. 50]000/- each of March 9, 2001. The husband telephoned her and made a request to come Ajmer from Bhilwara but she defied the request and used abusive language. She caused mental agony to husband by making complaints to the Superior Officers of husband about the behaviour and character of husband. At sagar also the behaviour of wife was cruel. She used to defy the directions of husband. AS and when the friends of husband visited his house, the wife refused to serve tea and snacks to them. She used to threaten the husband that she would commit suicide and implicate husband in false cases. The husband and his parents made solemn endeavours to live with the wife in a peaceful manners but their all efforts were in vein.

(3.) WE have heard learned counsel for the parties and scanned the material on record.