SHIVLAL Vs. SUKHDEV SINGH

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD learned Counsel for the parties.

(2.) THE appellant/defendant is aggrieved against the findings of fact recorded by two Courts below in the judgments dated 24.9.2001 and 24.7.2006 passed by the trial Court and First Appellate Court respectively.

(3.) TWO Courts below concurrently held that the land in dispute is land of public way and the appellant failed to prove the constructed platform and latrine within his pattasud land despite the fact that the appellant s positive case was that the construction which he raised in recent past was within the pattasud area of the house of the appellant.