NARAYAN SINGH Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THE appellants, ten in number, were put to trial before learned Additional Sessions Judge (Fast Track) No. 4 Jhalawar Camp Aklera in Sessions Case No. 107/2003, who vide judgment dated September 4, 2003 convicted and sentenced them as under:- Narayan Singh, Ram Lal, Madan Lal, Phool Singh, Rai Singh, Laxmi Narayan, Baij Singh @ Vijay Singh, Nanda, Kanwar Lal and Sumitra Bai: U/s. 302/149 IPC: Each to suffer imprisonment for life and fine Rs. 1000, in default to further suffer one year rigorous imprisonment. U/s. 326/149 IPC: Each to suffer rigorous imprisonment for three years and fine Rs. 500/- in default to further suffer six months rigorous imprisonment. U/s. 325/149 IPC: Each to suffer rigorous imprisonment for two years and fine Rs. 300, in default to further suffer three months rigorous imprisonment. U/s. 324/149 IPC: Each to suffer rigorous imprisonment for one year and fine Rs. 200/- in default to further suffer one month rigorous imprisonment. U/s. 323/149 IPC: Each to suffer rigorous imprisonment for six months and fine Rs. 100, in default to further suffer one month rigorous imprisonment. U/s. 148 IPC: Each to suffer rigorous imprisonment for one year and fine Rs. 200/- in default to further suffer one month rigorous imprisonment. Substantive sentences were ordered to run concurrently.

(2.) IT is the prosecution case that on October 26, 2000 parcha bayan of Rai Singh (Pw. 3) was recorded at Hospital Bakani at 3 PM wherein he stated that on the said day around 12 O' clock he along with his family members Daya Nand, Ramlal, Salagram, Ratan Lal had gone to the river to worship Diwali. While they were performing Pooja at the river suddenly Narayan Singh, Ramlal, Nanda, Phool Singh, Sumitra Bai, Madan Lal, Ram Singh, Laxmi Narayan, Baij Singh, Kanwar Lal, Bal Chand and Anar Singh came armed with Gandasi, Ballam, Sword, axes and lathis and started hurling abuses. Narayan Singh then inflicted Gandasi blow on the temple of Dayanand whereas Ram Lal gave gandasi blow on his head, Nanda and Phool Singh caused injuries on the hand of Dayanand with Ballam and lathi as a result of which Daya Nand fell down thereafter Sumitra Bai inflicted sword blow on the back of Dayanand. When Ram Lal, Salagram and Ratanlal tried to intervene Madan lal inflicted axe-blow on the head of Ramlal and Ram Singh inflicted axe-blow on his forehead. Laxmi Narayan gave axe-blow on the head of Salagram, Baij Singh inflicted axe-blow on the forehead of Salagram. Kanwar Lal, Banchand and Anar Singh gave beatings to Ratanlal with lathis. Anar Singh gave lathi-blow on the person of Rai Singh. Hearing hue and cry Dhapu Bai, Pappu Lal, Kalu Lal and Deoji came to the spot and saw the incident. Daya Nand was removed to the hospital where he succumbed to the injuries. On that parcha bayan a case was registered at Police Station Bhalta for the offence under sections 147, 148, 323, 324, 307 and 302 read with 149 IPC. The Investigating Agency embarked upon investigation of the impugned crime. After due investigation charge sheet was filed. In due course the case came up for trial before the learned Additional Sessions Judge (Fast Track) No. 4 Jhalawar Camp Aklera. Charges under sections 148, 323, 323/149, 302, 302/149, 326/149, 325, 325/149, 324/149 IPC were framed against the appellants, who denied the charges and claimed trial. The prosecution in support of its case examined as may as 26 witnesses. In the explanation under Sec. 313 Cr. P. C. , the appellants claimed innocence. Two witnesses in defence were examined. On hearing final submissions learned trial Judge convicted and sentenced the appellants as indicated herein above.

(3.) ESJS T;knk pksvsa ugha yxh Fkh esa rks py fqj jgk Fkka esa Fkkus ij bzrryk djus ds fy, x;k Fkka Fkkus esa tkdj esaus ekjihv djus okyksa ds uke crk fn;s Fksa fqj ogka ij ESJS glrk{kj djk;s Fksa** This report was concededly withheld by the prosecution. An adverse inference may therefore be drawn against the prosecution. Rai Singh further deposed that appellant Narayan Singh had also sustained injury and cross case under section 326 IPC was pending against him.