POONAM CHAND BHANDARI Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THE Projectjaipur, popularly known as Pink City, besides the - capital of the State of Rajasthan is an important tourist destination. THE growth of the city is rapid. It is rated as one, of -the fastest growing cities in the country. M/s. R. F. Properties & Trading Private Limited (respondent No. 4) says that the World Trade Park to be built by them shall be State of Art building to provide international show-case to the state industry. THE building is to have a computer controlled integrated building management system, wireless LAN, Trade Information Bureau, Electronic Trading Facilities, Electronic Facilities for ex-port enquiries, Auditoriums, Convention Center. Trade Fair Zones, Exhibition Centers, Showrooms. Display Centers, Corporate Offices, Guest Rooms, Multiplex, Conference Rooms with Video Conferencing Facility and Business Centers. THE building shall have special zones for B. P. O. Industry and service providers, Bio-Technology, Information Technology, Banking and Insurance, Gems and Jewelery, Handicrafts and Textiles etc. THE respondent No. 4 claims that the World Trade Park would increase business tourism, enhance investment in State. increase employment by providing direct employment to around 5]000 persons and indirect employment to around 20]000 persons. It shall be open to all, irrespective of segment or industry and empower the people of Rajasthan and provide them with a word of opportunities. THE Allotment

(2.) ON 1-9-2004. the respondent No. 4 submitted a proposal to the State Government for creating World Trade Center at Jaipur along with request for allotment of land. A presentation is said to have been made by the respondent No. 4 on that very day. In the presentation, the respondent No. 4 highlighted that Jaipur may be brought to a new pedestal for economic growth and up-liftment by providing state of the art World Trade Park.

(3.) THE matter was placed before the 17th Meeting of B. I. D. I. held on 17-12-2004. THE B. I. D. I. directed the Chief Secretary and the Additional Chief Secretary to Chief Minister to examine the issue and submit their recommendations regarding terms of allotment in the next meeting after obtaining the project report and company profile from the respondent No-4-