JAGDISH PRASAD SHARMA Vs. JAIPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY JAIPUR

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THE appellant-petitioner challenged the legality and validity of action of termination of his services by filing Writ Petition No. 1490 of 1989. THE learned Single Judge has rejected the Petition. It is against this judgment and order the this Special Appeal under Section 18 of the Rajasthan High Court Ordinance, 1949, has been filed by the appellant workman.

(2.) THE appellant-petitioner was appointed as Lower Division Clerk vide order dated February 29, 1988. His appointment was again extended by subsequent order dated September 8, 1988. In both the orders it is mentioned that the apppointment was for the purposes of maintenance of record and weeding out of the old record. In the preamble part of the order it is stated that his appointment, was for a period of six months. Again in the next paragraph of the order it is stated as follows: