MAINA KUMARI Vs. PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK

JUDGEMENT

(1.) SINCE there is a decision rendered by the learned Single Judge of this Court in the case of Daulat Ram v. Punjab National Bank reported in 1990(2) RLW 339 in favour of the appellant, therefore, till reference is decided by the Larger Bench, the instant second appeal -deserves to be admitted, therefore, it is hereby admitted and notice be issued to the respondent Bank.

(2.) THIS second appeal has been preferred against the older dated 23.12.1994 passed by the learned Additional District and Sessions Judge No. l, Chittorgarh in alleged Civil Appeal No. 83 of 1988 whereby the order dated 11.5.87 passed by the Prescribed Authority under Sub -section (1) of the Rajasthan Agricultural Credit Operations (Removal of Difficulties Act, 1974 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act No. 22 of 1.974') has been affirmed.

(3.) THE Sub Divisional Officer, Chittorgarh in his capacity as a prescribed authority within the meaning of Sub -section (1) of Section 13 of Act No. 22 of 1974 issued notice to the appellant who filed a detailed reply denying the alleged outstanding dues against her. According to the appellant she has already deposited Rs. 76,485/ - upto 5.7.85.